is true that we use the experience of another person for many things: the student learns math teacher, the son of the mother to eat, behave, the disciple of the master issues education in any field, because it is assumed that someone with more experience. The experience goes hand in hand with the common age. But it is true that sexual content is not the same: it lavishes the same: equal age and experience. Legitimacy is equal to ward off old age of no more sex. And when you imagine a young socially adult, sexually speaking - has negative connotations of pedophilia , de abuso de poder , de autoridad , y en muchos casos lamentablemente es así . Es curioso el empeño de nuestra cultura de separar edades: los grupos de amigos han de ser de la misma edad . Y las mezclas … son cosas de bichos raros, de “pervertidos” . Se controla a la gente organizándola en edades. Las mezclas son peligrosas: demasiado aprendizaje directo y experiencia . Se perdieron los contactos de generaciones sobre otras generaciones y se legitima que los niños estén con niños y los mayores con mayores.
Son formas de control, de alejarnos de la sabiduría potencial que da el encuentro desorganizado , libre y espontáneo. Por lo tanto entiendo que es otra vez un tipo de control: control de la Sex education is delegated to the company (the same). It has been regulated country sexual experience and is considered free when they have sex two inexperienced (same age). And it is relegated to have sex perversion when a father and son. And those who do not use it morbidly censor.
If it were a social taboo pedophiles would not be so popular and having sex between parents and children in a free, no risk would be hidden and denied incestuous sex. In that incest has become: something hidden. As much as we offend the problem is not incest but the use of it is done: the disease is hidden, the hidden, shadow (say one thing and doing the opposite) unmanifest, it is prohibited. And curiously the dictionary falls short of defining incest sex calls with people in the degrees of relationship prohibited by law. I mean, not really define anything. But the definition is associated with a legal issue and criminal. No risk in incest but forbidden by law. The rest is pure invention and moral economy of part-and morbid - the way out there for anyone who needs to live in violation of the prohibition.
And then there are those free beings who occasionally come to light are recognizing that couples with their sisters and brothers. And freedom becomes suppressed disease in the eyes of those who observe outside. Published
Blogger-droid with
v1.6.5 Source http://lasmentirasdelsexo.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment